|
Posted: 12 Apr 2013 04:33 AM PDT
Referencia: ThunderBolts.info .
por Stephen Smith, 9 de abril 2013
Los campos magnéticos galácticos fueron descubiertos hace más de 50 años. Pero los astrónomos continúan haciéndose preguntas básicas acerca de las galaxias: ¿Qué genera los campos magnéticos? ¿Qué da a los campos su forma y su fuerza? Los investigadores que utilizan las simulaciones informáticas más avanzadas creen haber encontrado la respuesta. Dicen que el gas frío que cae dentro de las galaxias, las explosiones de supernovas, el nacimiento de nuevas estrellas y la energía de rotación de dichas galaxias son los que crean los campos. Sin embargo, faltan otros factores en sus ecuaciones, ya que los modelos no son capaces de predecir los campos observados en varias galaxias espirales representativas. ¿Cómo observan los científicos extrasolares los campos magnéticos? George Ellery Hale representa primero el campo magnético del Sol a través del "efecto Zeeman", o el cambio de posición de las líneas de Fraunhofer que se encuentran en los espectrogramas del Sol. El espectro óptico indica qué productos químicos se pueden encontrar en el Sol, así como en otras estrellas. Mediante la descomposición de la luz de la estrella en sus componentes, igual que hace un prisma con la luz blanca, las líneas oscuras en lugares específicos proporcionan una forma de determinar los elementos constitutivos de una estrella. En presencia de un campo magnético, los elementos producen líneas espectrales que se dividen y ocupan diferentes posiciones. Estos cambios de posición se conocen como el efecto Zeeman. No son de extrañar que esos contornos del campo magnético que rodean a las estrellas, así como los observados alrededor de las galaxias, sigan sin explicación en las mentes de aquellos que sostienen el punto de vista convencional. En la piscina teorética del conocimiento que ellos dibujan, no existen entidades eléctricas que proporcionen la fuente para que el magnetismo. En cambio, se discuten "la formación de estrellas reductora de la energía turbulenta", las "eyecciones de gas" y "la rápida aparición de campos magnéticos que surgen de forma aleatoria". En sus cálculos no se incluye el electromagnetismo, ni los campos eléctricos ni los efectos moto-generadores. Los campos magnéticos en el espacio pueden ser detectados más fácilmente que las corrientes eléctricas, así que los astrónomos modernos piensan que los campos son fragmentos "primordiales" dejados ahí por el Big Bang. Ellos confían en la conclusión que explica cómo se formaron las estructuras que componen el Universo. El hecho de que estas cargas en movimiento constituyen una corriente eléctrica que pueden generar campos magnéticos se conoce desde los días de Michael Faraday; sin embargo, la falta de conocimiento a menudo significa falta de visión. Como se ha indicado anteriormente, el movimiento de las partículas cargadas constituye una corriente eléctrica, y que la corriente está envuelta en un campo magnético. Cuanto más se aceleran las partículas cargadas en la misma dirección, más fuerte se hace el campo. Esto es una noción muy conocida por los ingenieros eléctricos, pero cuando los astrónomos encuentran cargas en movimiento en el espacio se quedan desconcertados y se refieren a ellos como "vientos" u "ondas de choque". Otra cosa no considerada cuando los investigadores tratan de explicar la estructura del Universo, es que las partículas cargadas se mueven, deben moverse en un circuito. Los eventos energéticos no se puede explicar solamente por las condiciones locales, deben ser considerados los efectos de un circuito completo. Por esta razón, mientras que en su visión del mundo el consenso científico sólo permite solitarias "islas" de espacio, el Universo Eléctrico enfatiza la conectividad con una red eléctricamente activa de "líneas de transmisión" compuestas por filamentos de corrientes de Birkeland. Los filamentos se expanden y explotan, expulsando el plasma que puede acelerarse a cerca de velocidad de la luz. Los chorros van desde los polos opuestos de un extremo galaxia en nubes energéticas que emiten frecuencias de rayos X. Estos fenómenos están basados en la ciencia del plasma y no en la cinética de los gases, la gravedad, ni en la física de partículas. Los astrofísicos ven los campos magnéticos, pero no la electricidad subyacente, por lo que se encuentran perdidos a la hora de explicarlo. Los astrónomos sostienen que las galaxias son nubes del gas hidrógeno y de polvo intergaláctico que fueron reunidos por la gravedad hasta fusionarse en brillantes fuegos termonucleares. La comunidad convencional propone también que, la mayoría de las galaxias contienen agujeros negros de magnitud increíble. Son esas "fuentes puntuales gravitacionales" las que causan el giro de las galaxias, chorros de rayos gamma y de rayos X que abarcan miles de años luz hasta que aparecen, algo así como "lóbulos de radio" a veces más grandes que la misma galaxia donde se forma. La teoría del Universo Eléctrico no se adhiere a esta idea condensación de hidrógeno frío e inerte y de partículas de circón no más grandes que una molécula. Así pues, ¿Qué son las galaxias? En 1981, Hannes Alfvén, dijo que las galaxias se parecen mucho a uno de los inventos Michael Faraday, el motor homopolar. Un motor homopolar se mueve por los campos magnéticos inducidos en una placa circular conductora. Esta placa está montada entre los polos de un electroimán, causando que gire a una velocidad proporcional a la corriente de entrada. Las galaxias se mueven dentro de un filamentoso circuito de electricidad que fluye a través de todo el cosmos, de principio a fin. Nosotros vemos los efectos de esos campos electromagnéticos que permean el espacio. La electricidad se organiza dentro de masas de plasma, a veces más grandes que los cúmulos galácticos. Ese plasma está compuesto principalmente de átomos neutros, aunque también están presentes los electrones libres, protones y otras partículas cargadas. Energía eléctrica primordial es de varios órdenes de magnitud más poderosa que la gravedad. Las "cuerdas de plasma" que comprenden las corrientes de Birkeland se atraen entre sí en la distancia, en una relación lineal, por lo que las corrientes de Birkeland son la fuerza atractiva de largo alcance más poderosa del Universo. Las corrientes eléctricas fluyen a través del plasma de polvo manteniendo los campos magnéticos detectados en las estrellas y galaxias. - Imagen: Tres galaxias interactuando: NGC 7173 (centro izquierda), NGC 7174 (centro derecha) y NGC 7176 (abajo derecha). Crédito: NASA, ESA, y R. Sharples (Universidad de Durham)
Fuente Pedro Donaire, BITNAVEGANTES
|
30 March 2013, Geneva, Switzerland
The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) Collaboration announces the publication of its first physics result in Physical Review Letters. The AMS Experiment is the most powerful and sensitive particle physics spectrometer ever deployed in space. As seen in Figure 1, AMS is located on the exterior of the International Space Station (ISS) and since its installation on 19 May 2011 it has measured over 30 billion cosmic rays at energies up to trillions of electron volts. Its permanent magnet and array of precision particle detectors collect and identify charged cosmic rays passing through AMS from the far reaches of space. Over its long duration mission on the ISS, AMS will record signals from 16 billion cosmic rays every year and transmit them to Earth for analysis by the AMS Collaboration. This is the first of many physics results to be reported.
Figure 1: From its vantage point ~260 miles (~400 km) above the Earth, the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) collects data from primordial cosmic rays that traverse the detector.
In the initial 18 month period of space operations, from 19 May 2011 to 10 December 2012, AMS analyzed 25 billion primary cosmic ray events. Of these, an unprecedented number, 6.8 million, were unambiguously identified as electrons and their antimatter counterpart, positrons. The 6.8 million particles observed in the energy range 0.5 to 350 GeV are the subject of the precision study reported in this first paper.
Electrons and positrons are identified by the accurate and redundant measurements provided by the various AMS instruments against a large background of protons. Positrons are clearly distinguished from this background through the robust rejection power of AMS of more than one in one million.
Currently, the total number of positrons identified by AMS, in excess of 400,000, is the largest number of energetic antimatter particles directly measured and analyzed from space. The present paper can be summarized as follows:
AMS has measured the positron fraction (ratio of the positron flux to the combined flux of positrons and electrons) in the energy range 0.5 to 350 GeV. We have observed that from 0.5 to 10 GeV, the fraction decreases with increasing energy. The fraction then increases steadily between 10 GeV to ~250 GeV. Yet the slope (rate of growth) of the positron fraction decreases by an order of magnitude from 20 to 250 GeV. At energies above 250 GeV, the spectrum appears to flatten but to study the behavior above 250 GeV requires more statistics – the data reported represents ~10% of the total expected. The positron fraction spectrum exhibits no structure nor time dependence. The positron to electron ratio shows no anisotropy indicating the energetic positrons are not coming from a preferred direction in space. Together, these features show evidence of a new physics phenomena.
Figure 2 illustrates the AMS data presented in the first publication.
Figure 2: The positron fraction measured by AMS demonstrates excellent agreement with the model described below. Even with the high statistics, 6.8 million events, and accuracy of AMS, the fraction shows no fine structure.
The exact shape of the spectrum, as shown in Figure 2, extended to higher energies, will ultimately determine whether this spectrum originates from the collision of dark matter particles or from pulsars in the galaxy. The high level of accuracy of this data shows that AMS will soon resolve this issue.
Over the last few decades there has been much interest on the positron fraction from primary cosmic rays by both particle physicists and astrophysicists. The underlying reason for this interest is that by measuring the ratio between positrons and electrons and by studying the behavior of any excess across the energy spectrum, a better understanding of the origin of dark matter and other physics phenomena can be obtained.
The first AMS result has been analyzed using several phenomenological models, one of which is described in the paper and included in Figure 2. This model, with diffuse electron and positron components and a common source component, fits the AMS data surprisingly well. This agreement indicates that the positron fraction spectrum is consistent with electron positron fluxes each of which is the sum of its diffuse spectrum and a single energetic common source. In other words, a significant portion of the high‐energy electrons and positrons originate from a common source.
AMS is a magnetic spectrometer with the ability to explore new physics because of its precision, statistics, energy range, capability to identify different particles and nuclei and its long duration in space. As shown in Figure 3, the accuracy of AMS and the high statistics available distinguish the reported positron fraction spectrum from earlier experiments.
It is expected that hundreds of billions of cosmic rays will be measured by AMS throughout the lifetime of the Space Station. The volume of raw data requires a massive analysis effort. The parameters of each signal collected are meticulously reconstructed, characterized and archived before they undergo analysis by multiple independent groups of AMS physicists thus ensuring the accuracy of the physics results.
Figure 3: A comparison of AMS results with recent published measurements.
With its magnet and precision particle detectors, high accuracy and statistics, the first result of AMS, based on only ~10% of the total data expected, is clearly distinguished from earlier experiments (see References).
Background of AMS
The first publication from the AMS Experiment is a major milestone for the AMS international collaboration. Hundreds of scientists, engineers, technicians and students from all over the world have worked together for over 18 years to make AMS a reality. The collaboration represents 16 countries from Europe, Asia and North America (Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Romania, Russia, Turkey, China, Korea, Taiwan, Mexico and the United States) under the leadership of Nobel Laureate Samuel Ting of M.I.T. The collaboration continues to work closely with the excellent NASA AMS Project Management team from Johnson Space Center as it has throughout the entire process.
AMS is a U.S. Department of Energy sponsored particle physics experiment on the ISS under a DOE‐NASA Implementing Arrangement. AMS was constructed at universities and research institutes around the world and assembled at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. It was transported to the Kennedy Space Center in August 2010 onboard a special C‐5M transport aircraft of the U.S. Air Force Air Mobility Command. AMS was launched by NASA to the ISS as the primary payload onboard the final mission of space shuttle Endeavour (STS‐134) on 16 May 2011. The crew of STS‐134, Greg Johnson, Mike Fincke, Greg Chamitoff, Drew Feustel, Roberto Vittori under the command of Mark Kelly, successfully deployed AMS as an external attachment on the U.S. ISS National Laboratory on 19 May 2011. Once installed, AMS was powered up and immediately began collecting data from primary sources in space and these were transmitted to the AMS Payload Operations Control Center (POCC). The POCC is located at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Once AMS became operational, the first task for the AMS Collaboration was to ensure that all instruments and systems performed as designed and as tested on the ground. The AMS detector, with its multiple redundancies, has proven to perform flawlessly in space. Over the last 22 months in flight, AMS collaborators have gained invaluable operational experience in running a precision spectrometer in space and mitigating the hazardous conditions to which AMS is exposed as it orbits the Earth every 90 minutes. These are conditions that are not encountered by ground‐based accelerator experiments or satellite‐based experiments and require constant vigilance in order to avoid irreparable damage. These include the extreme thermal variations caused by solar effects and the re‐positioning of ISS onboard radiators and solar arrays. In addition, the AMS operators regularly transmit software updates from the AMS POCC at CERN to the AMS computers in space in order to match the regular upgrades of the ISS software and hardware.
With the wealth of data emitted by primary cosmic rays passing through AMS, the Collaboration will also explore other topics such as the precision measurements of the boron to carbon ratio, nuclei and antimatter nuclei, and antiprotons, precision measurements of the helium flux, proton flux and photons, as well as the search for new physics and astrophysics phenomena such as strangelets.
The AMS Collaboration will provide new, accurate information over the lifetime of the Space Station as the AMS detector continues its mission to explore new physics phenomena in the cosmos (as seen in Figure 4).
Figure 4: The International Space Station provides a unique platform for the AMS detector that is charting a new realm of fundamental physics research not possible to achieve on Earth. All primary charged particles and high-energy gamma rays are absorbed by the Earth’s atmosphere. AMS is currently the only precision magnetic spectrometer that will stay on ISS for its lifetime.
The U.S. participation involves MIT, Yale (Professor Jack Sandweiss), Texas A&M (Professor Peter MacIntyre) University of Hawaii (Professor Veronica Bindi), the University of Maryland (Professor Roald Sagdeev and Professor Eun Suk Seo) and NASA’s Johnson Space Center (Mr. Trent Martin and Mr. Kenneth Bollweg). The AMS project is coordinated by the Laboratory for Nuclear Science at MIT under the leadership of Professor Richard Milner. The major responsibility for space operations and data analysis are Drs. M. Capell, U.J. Becker, J. Burger, A. Kounine, V. Choutko, P. Fisher, A. Lebedev, X.D. Cai, V. Koutsenko and P. Zuccon of MIT.
Many countries have made important contributions to the AMS detector construction and presently to the data analysis. These include:
- Germany, under the leadership of Professor Dr. Stefan Schael, supported by DLR and RWTH Aachen.
- Italy, under the leadership of Professor Roberto Battiston, supported by ASI and INFN.
- Spain, under the leadership of Professor Manuel Aguilar and Dr. Javier Berdugo, supported by CIEMAT and CDTI.
- France, under the leadership of Professor Sylvie Rosier‐Lees, supported by CNRS, IN2P3 and CNES.
- Taiwan, under the leadership of Academician Shi‐chang Lee, supported by the Academia Sinica , the National Science Council and CSIST.
- Chinese universities and research institutes have made important contributions. These include: Shandong University, under the leadership of Professor Cheng Lin; the Institute of High Energy Physics in Beijing, under leadership of Academician He‐ sheng Chen; Southeast University in Nanjing, under the leadership of Professor Hong Yi; Sun Yat‐sen University in Guangzhou, under the leadership of Professor N.S. Xu; as well as Shanghai Jiaotong University in Shanghai, and the Institute of Electrical Engineering, NLAA, and the Chinese Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology in Beijing.
- Switzerland, under the leadership of Professor Martin Pohl of the University of Geneva, supported by SNSF.
References
TS93: R. Golden et al., Astrophys. J. 457 (1996) L103.
Wizard/CAPRICE: M. Boezio et al., Adv. Sp. Res. 27‐4 (2001) 669.
HEAT: J. J. Beatty et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 241102; M. A. DuVernois et al., Astrophys. J. 559 (2001) 296.
AMS‐01: M. Aguilar et al., Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007) 145.
PAMELA: P. Picozza, Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Particle and Fundamental Physics in Space, Geneva, 5‐7 Nov. 2012, to be published. The value in the highest energy bin is the 90 % confidence level lower limit. We are grateful to Professor Picozza for providing us with accurate information on the PAMELA experiment. Note: 1) The data are obtained directly from the absolute fluxes of electrons and positrons, gotten independently. 2) The reported errors contain not only statistical errors, but also a portion of the systematics. 3) The data shown have been collected between June 2006 and January 2010. They represent an average of the solar modulation. O. Adriani et al.,Astropart. Phys. 34 (2010) 1; O. Adriani et al., Nature 458 (2009) 607.
Fermi‐LAT: M. Ackermann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 011103.

